Densely-populated English lowlands?

A common factor cited as precluding large-scale rewilding in the English lowlands is human population density – the UK is a densely populated country, the lowlands of the south particularly so, and there’s thus simply no room to set land aside for wild nature.

That’s true if one lumps high-density urban areas – like London, the commuter suburbs and the south coast conurbations – into one’s calculation of mean human population density. But I wonder to what extent such urban data skew the picture for the countryside – i.e. the areas which might actually be rewilded to support large herbivores and their predators? How does our rural human population density compare to that of countries that have managed to retain at least some large mammals – India, Nepal, Cambodia? Maybe our rural areas are indeed much more densely settled.

A much more decisive problem to my mind would be the density of the highway network. How dense is the web of rural roads in areas with relatively low human population density?  And how do traffic volumes and speeds vary across this network?

Are there areas with low human population density, low road density, low traffic volumes and speeds, and low agricultural yields?


3 thoughts on “Densely-populated English lowlands?

    1. Hi Tom – if you happen to come across reliable data on traffic flows across the UK road network (including the small country lanes), or a model that can reliably predict such flows, please let me know! Thanks, Steve


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s